chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Chicken-users] Chicken Testing (Was: file-exists? on Windows)


From: Kon Lovett
Subject: [Chicken-users] Chicken Testing (Was: file-exists? on Windows)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:51:20 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On May 14, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Graham Fawcett wrote:

On 14 May 2007 16:05:34 -0300, Mario Domenech Goulart
<address@hidden> wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:58:26 -0400 "Graham Fawcett" <address@hidden> wrote: > Insert fuzzy, incomplete thought here, about how we could use a system
> for cooperatively defining unit tests against Chicken and extension
> modules, to turn up and help resolve issues like these. (It should be
> as easy to define a test as it is to edit a Wiki page, and at least
> twice as fun.)

If I remember (and understand) correctly, Alejandro has some ideas
about extending svnwiki to provide a wiki interface for test-cases
submission.

Yes, that's the sort of thing. I think the test-cases should
ultimately end up Chicken's source repository -- or the eggs
repository, for modules -- so that they can be performed after a build
if desired. But a Web-based tool (wiki or otherwise) would be an easy
way to share, discuss and refine tests.

Currently I am using {chicken-repository}/testbase/tests to hold the per egg test files. But I understand Felix is thinking of moving to a subdir per installed egg. In that situation it makes more sense to include them in the installed egg dir.


Sandboxing would be crucially important if the wiki were chosen,
though. I would hate to test if (zero? (system "rm -Rf /")) is true on
my platform...

Yep forgot to support this. Thanks.


G


g

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkZIy8kACgkQJJNoeGe+5O5p/wCfYfEDFBFZO4AjwsS3Yz0LE2tx
3h4Anir8gEm7YqCARCvk0OS8YRLTucP5
=5C7b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]