Re: [Chicken-users] Recursive define-macro

[Joshua Griffith]

Thanks, using a less `clever' map form worked.

-Josh

On 3/7/07, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:

On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:37 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:

> On 3/7/07, Joshua Griffith < address@hidden> wrote:
>> I get an unbound variable error when I execute the following:
>> (define-macro (test alist) (if (> 0 (length alist)) (test (cdr
>> alist))))

I think this explains the above error:

#;1> rec
Error: unbound variable: rec
#;1> (macro? 'rec)
#t

A variable bound to a macro is not a regular variable.

If you need to recurse to perform macro expansion just use any of the
syntax forms that help - named let, rec, repeat, do, etc.

>>
>> Are recursive define-macro definitions possible?
>
> The code inside a macro is executed at macro-expansion time,
> and should probably not refer to itself for expansion. A macro
> can be recursive by *expanding* into code that refers to the macro
> (but that might end in endless recursion).

Yeah, using the macro expansion machinery to perform recursive
expansion can work but tricky. A technique that might called "clever".

>
>
> cheers,
> felix
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users



_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users