|
| From: | Zbigniew |
| Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete! |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:05:30 -0600 |
Just be careful of future updates to Chicken's implementation. Alternatively, this behavior could be made to be guaranteed in Chicken. It sounds like a good idea to me, but I am not an expert. On 3/5/07, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
Zbigniew is right but you could conditionally expand:
(cond-expand
(chicken
... hash-table-walk delete ... )
(else
... safe delete ... ) )
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |