[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Unit testing
From: |
Alejandro Forero Cuervo |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Unit testing |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:01:21 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
> If the unit test egg authors don't have the man hours to add what
> you're looking for, why don't you extend one of their eggs, instead
> of starting from scratch? Are they dead projects? Have you already
> determined that their code is not easy to understand, use, or
> modify?
Those eggs weren't designed for they kind of use I'd be doing. I
think designing the specific syntax and semantics for defining tests
requires far more work than actually implementing them. I believe my
implementation will be shorter than reasonable documentation
explaining how to use it. As such, I see little advantage in reusing
their code.
If, on the other hand, you want to extend one of these eggs to make it
up to the task of what I want to achieve, you're more than welcome to
do so.
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/