For CMake, if we solve the outstanding problems with Linux dependencies,
Windows eggs, and don't identify any new lurking problems, I believe we
should bill the CMake build as "beta quality." Why? Well, because I
just threw down the gauntlet to a SBCL booster about how much their
Windows build sucks. :-) Ego aside, because it's been in development
for 10 months and seems to be working. It's really not "experimental"
anymore. Of course if people find new problems before we release, and
it doesn't live up to a "beta" label, then we'll state the reality. But
I really want to release CMake as a beta, and ensure that it's good
enough for that.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread]
[Chicken-users] CMake at beta quality,
Brandon J. Van Every<=