Re: [Chicken-users] yet another java interface + spiffy update

[felix winkelmann]

On 3/10/06, Graham Fawcett <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> No, that's fine. It's just that the setup file had a dependency on
> doc.scm -- as written, chicken-setup couldn't complete the build. It
> was easy to comment out the dependency and rebuild, but perhaps the
> (doc.scm -> html) task could be made conditional upon the existence of
> doc.scm?

Argh. My mistake. That second make rule shouldn't be there. I'll fix this.


cheers,
felix