Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed

[Brandon J. Van Every]

felix winkelmann wrote:

> On 1/10/06, Sergey Khorev <address@hidden> wrote:
>  
>
> > Ok. It seems that Brandon and me can cover these tasks.
> > I'll take a look what can be done for Open Watcom. If someone wants to use it, 
> > why
> > not? Ppersonally I can't find sufficiently good reason to migrate to Watcom 
> > besides of
> > probability to get slightly better optimised code.
> >    
>
> It's mostly a free tool alternative, independent of M$ and suppossedly easy to
> use. It's not the *main* alternative, but if we can support it without too much
> hassle, we should.
Please communicate with Bill Hoffman (CC:'d) of CMake fame as you 
(Sergey, Bob) look into this.  Bill says he almost has an OpenWatcom 
generator done.  http://www.openwatcom.org is the compiler you're 
talking about, right?  Or is the Watcom legacy more confusing than that?


Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
"The pioneer is the one with the arrows in his back."
                         - anonymous entrepreneur