Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros.

[felix winkelmann]

On 11/21/05, Pupeno <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > You only need to handle compiler-specifiic syntax, which is mainly
> > #> ... <#-
> Why ? I already handle that and I already encountered cases where I'd have to
> handle <<EOF and similar.

The standard reader should handle #<<... by default.

>
> BTW, what should I return from my procedures that handle extensions. I was
> returning '() but that causes an error, I am now returning '(nevermind) since
> I don't care about it.

Sorry, what kind of procedures are that?


cheers,
felix