Re: [Chicken-users] experimenting with http-server

[felix winkelmann]

On 5/25/05, Michele Simionato <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 5/25/05, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I would recommend to use spiffy instead iof the raw http extension.
> 
> Ack! Shame on me for not checking out spiffy! BTW, could you add a line
> just after the http-server example telling people that they may want
> to use spiffy instead? I assume there are people in the world
> that, looking for an http server in Chicken, would first check for
> "http-server" instead that for something called "spiffy" ;)
> 

Hm... You have a point there... :-)


cheers,
felix