Re: [Chicken-users] problems with SRFI-10 implementation

[felix winkelmann]

On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:16:12 +0200, Thomas Chust <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Oops, you're right. But this is very counter-intuitive, isn't it? In my
> eyes, every data object should evaluate to itself, because otherwise
> (like in this example) there are objects which cannot be evaluated at
> all! Well, it's probably more a question of taste...
> 

It is, I guess. Scheme vectors aren't self-evaluating as well (and the
empty list), so it's probably ok. It also helps catching certain
errors.


cheers,
felix