[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Chicken-users] Patch for tagged pointers
From: |
Jonah Beckford |
Subject: |
RE: [Chicken-users] Patch for tagged pointers |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:27:23 -0500 |
Agreed.
Thanks, Jonah
-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Winkelmann [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: February 13, 2003 4:57 AM
To: Jonah Beckford
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Patch for tagged pointers
Jonah Beckford wrote:
> The new C_TAGGED_POINTER_TYPE does not have a representation as a
> TinyCLOS metaobject. Thanks Felix for adding that into CVS.
>
Right. Forgot about that. Many thanks for the patch.
Perhaps we should make <tagged-pointer> be a subclass of <pointer>? The
following will do that:
(define <tagged-pointer> (make-primitive-class "tagged-pointer"
<pointer>)))
cheers,
felix