[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent
From: |
felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 09:02:34 +0200 |
>
> So, what is the verdict about this?
Opps, Sorry. I'm a bit slow these days (lots of work).
So what do you need:
1) s64vector/u64vector-support for SRFI-4
2) A foreign type ìnt64/unsigned-int64
There are some minor troubles that make this not quite trivial
(it has to compile at least on gcc and msvc; and the handling of
those data types needs some special work when transforming
arguments/results to foreign code. A 64 bit integer would necessarily
be passed as a float, since I don't want to add another basic
numeric type - that would need a complete re-write of all
procedures that handle numbers)
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent,
felix <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/27