Re: [Chicken-users] That documentation problem...

[Kirill Lisovsky]

Hello!

On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, felix wrote:

> I guess something has to be done about the documentation-situation, now.
> I'm in the process of doing some machine-translation of `manual.html'
> into something that is perhaps easier convertible into a more usable
> format.
> 
> So, I basically see two paths now: texinfo or LaTeX.
> 
> If anybody has a plan, please tell so. Otherwise I'm going
> to plunge right into using whatever turns out to be easier.
>
Probably I'm joining this discussion too late...

Why not XML or SXML?
It can be converted to anything using Scheme or XSLT stylesheets. 
SXML is Chicken-friendly, I believe that I can produce a Chicken version of
Scheme-enabled XSLT processor (which works on either XML or SXML data), and 
in a day or two.
 
Best regards,
         Kirill.