[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent
From: |
Peter Keller |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 11:20:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2i |
Forgot to CC the list:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:11:13PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> Peter Keller <address@hidden> writes:
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 08:55:06PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > > Don't forget "long long". On many platforms, things like off_t's are
> > > long longs...
> >
> > Technically, "long long" is a lie. :) It isn't in the ANSI spec,
>
> Yes it is. Read the C99 document. Want me to quote chapter and verse?
No, you don't need to quote. I forgot that thing finally got ratified.
Cool, that means all sorts of good stuff is going to end up in compilers soon.
-pete
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Benedikt Rosenau, 2002/08/17
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent,
Peter Keller <=