[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: #1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming?
From: |
Chicken Trac |
Subject: |
Re: #1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming? |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Jun 2021 11:59:49 -0000 |
#1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming?
---------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: Idiomdrottning | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: someday
Component: unknown | Version: 5.2.0
Resolution: invalid | Keywords:
Estimated difficulty: |
---------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by sjamaan):
This is actually a corner case of ER macros, too. It's unspecified what
should happen if you rename an identifier at toplevel. Currently, CHICKEN
just strips the renaming, but this may change in the future, so it's
better to leave those "unnecessary" injects, IMO.
--
Ticket URL: <https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1760#comment:7>
CHICKEN Scheme <https://www.call-cc.org/>
CHICKEN Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.
- #1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming?, Chicken Trac, 2021/06/02
- Re: #1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming?, Chicken Trac, 2021/06/02
- Re: #1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming?, Chicken Trac, 2021/06/02
- Re: #1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming?, Chicken Trac, 2021/06/02
- Re: #1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming?, Chicken Trac, 2021/06/02
- Re: #1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming?, Chicken Trac, 2021/06/02
- Re: #1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming?, Chicken Trac, 2021/06/02
- Re: #1760: IR-transformer not implicitly renaming?,
Chicken Trac <=