[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-janitors] #1574: Redefining reverse in csi makes lambda behave
From: |
Chicken Trac |
Subject: |
[Chicken-janitors] #1574: Redefining reverse in csi makes lambda behave differently, and even segfault |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:25:58 -0000 |
#1574: Redefining reverse in csi makes lambda behave differently, and even
segfault
----------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: kooda | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: someday
Component: compiler | Version: 5.0.0
Keywords: | Estimated difficulty: hard
----------------------+--------------------------------
Running this in csi triggers a segfault in ##sys#decompose-lambda-list
(eval.scm), even though reverse is bound in a let.
{{{
(define reverse 1)
(lambda (foo . bar) bar)
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1574>
CHICKEN Scheme <https://www.call-cc.org/>
CHICKEN Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Chicken-janitors] #1574: Redefining reverse in csi makes lambda behave differently, and even segfault,
Chicken Trac <=