[Chicken-janitors] Re: #394: implicit renaming macros

[Chicken Trac]

#394: implicit renaming macros
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  sjamaan            |       Owner:  felix                        
      Type:  enhancement        |      Status:  closed                       
  Priority:  not urgent at all  |   Milestone:  4.7.0                        
 Component:  expander           |     Version:  4.6.x                        
Resolution:  fixed              |    Keywords:  ir-macros, reverse, er-macros
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by felix):

 Replying to [comment:3 sjamaan]:
 > Here's a patch for the manual. I've also added a few words to the ER
 macro text, as well as fixed a potential bug in the "cond" example (the
 recursive call to cond wasn't renamed).  Since it's a tutorial, we might
 as well be pedantic. I've added an explanation of this potential bug to
 the tutorial too.

 Patch applied - thanks, Peter.

 >
 > By the way, what do you think about changing the ER macro examples to
 explicitly use er-macro-transformer?  This would make it a little clearer
 I think (less people wondering "why do we need to use ir-macro-transformer
 here but nothing there?")

 Yes, good point. I have changed the examples accordingly - perhaps you
 could verify that it what you suggested.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/394#comment:5>
Chicken Scheme <http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/>
Chicken Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.