[Chicken-janitors] Re: #312: suggestions for more "semantic tags" in the wiki parser

[Chicken Trac]

#312: suggestions for more "semantic tags" in the wiki parser
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  felix              |       Owner:  sjamaan
      Type:  enhancement        |      Status:  new    
  Priority:  not urgent at all  |   Milestone:         
 Component:  infrastructure     |     Version:         
Resolution:                     |    Keywords:  wiki   
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by zbigniew):

 Yes please.  I have been waiting for this moment forever.

 Another interesting tag might be <class> for coops.

 In the manual there are a few other tags such as [import specifier] and
 [module].  I think [module] can be omitted semantically because these show
 up in chicken-doc and really in the manual as separate nodes anyway.
 [import specifier] can probably be usurped by <syntax> and then "only",
 "rename" etc. would show up as nodes.

 It would also be interesting to make foreign types such as "scheme-object"
 and "integer32" light up.

 It is not clear to me whether C functions, such as the ones in
 man/4/Embedding, should be marked up semantically.  It could be useful,
 especially if it were used to document the core in general, if that ever
 happens.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/312#comment:1>
Chicken Scheme <http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/>
Chicken Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.