Re: [Chicken-janitors] Re: [Chicken-bugs] #356: inline recursion

[felix winkelmann]

>
> heres some mostly-not-pseudocode to explain what i meant.  i make no promises
> about whether this will work as currently coded, nor that i havent made stupid
> errors, nor that this is optimal, nor ... you get the idea.  i threw it 
> together
> in a few hours, but it should work as an explanation.
>

Thanks, elf. This looks interesting, but seems to be a bit heavyweight
(I mean, it
is a lot of work, together with some custom code-walking). I've added the file
to the repository (misc/inline.scm), but can not tell yet, when I'll get around
looking more deeply into this.


cheers,
felix