Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix arguments to scrutiny reporting procedure for `append'

[Evan Hanson]

On 2019-03-25 14:23, megane wrote:
> The last patchset contained a more comprehensive message format test
> suite. I guess I just forgot to mention that, sorry :P
> 
> Here's a patch that applies on top of this fix.

Thanks megane, here's a signed-off copy.

I changed the new TVs ('foo et al.) to 'a, 'b, and 'c so the gensym
redaction script would pick them up, and reenabled the commented-out
`zero-values-for-conditional' tests. If there's a reason those really
should be disabled, just shout.

Cheers,

Evan