|
From: | megane |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-hackers] Regarding the hide declaration, #1376 |
Date: | Tue, 06 Jun 2017 08:24:47 +0300 |
User-agent: | mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 24.4.1 |
Evan Hanson <address@hidden> writes: >> Which foo should be hidden? Both, or none? > > Personally, I'd expect the following behaviour, depending on where the > declaration appears: > I did some tests with and without the POC patch I sent yesterday. Some observations: (these are the only variables with differing behaviour, see the attached diff) - foo1, bar1, foo2, bar2 are now hidden correctly - foo7, bar7, foo8, bar8 are now hidden incorrectly. This should be easy to fix by changing the visibility value of the identifier in the export macro.
foo.scm
Description: Binary data
without.out
Description: Binary data
with.out
Description: Binary data
diff
Description: Binary data
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |