[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Regarding the hide declaration, #1376

From: megane
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Regarding the hide declaration, #1376
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 08:24:47 +0300
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 24.4.1

Evan Hanson <address@hidden> writes:

>> Which foo should be hidden?  Both, or none?
> Personally, I'd expect the following behaviour, depending on where the
> declaration appears:

I did some tests with and without the POC patch I sent yesterday.

Some observations:
(these are the only variables with differing behaviour, see the
attached diff)

- foo1, bar1, foo2, bar2 are now hidden correctly
- foo7, bar7, foo8, bar8 are now hidden incorrectly. This should be easy
to fix by changing the visibility value of the identifier in the export macro.

Attachment: foo.scm
Description: Binary data

Attachment: without.out
Description: Binary data

Attachment: with.out
Description: Binary data

Attachment: diff
Description: Binary data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]