[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] Add missing syntax checks
|
From: |
Peter Bex |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] Add missing syntax checks |
|
Date: |
Sun, 28 May 2017 13:02:30 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:04:05PM +0200, lemonboy wrote:
> Hello hackers,
> this patch does what it says on the tin and can be safely applied to
> the 4 branch,
> I didn't supply a separate patch in the hope the patch(1) deity
> manages me to spare
> this effort :)
Good catch, however the syntax check for define-foreign-type is too
strict: it should accept anything that evaluates to a procedure,
not just a symbol that refers to one. The attached patch fixes
that.
Cheers,
Peter
0001-Check-the-syntax-correctness-for-some-constructs.patch
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature