[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Ambiguity in csc's command line options (#1193)
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Ambiguity in csc's command line options (#1193) |
Date: |
Sat, 23 May 2015 18:53:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit:
> 2. support GNU-style command line options, that is, --<long> and -<l>.
> Then we'd have --lfa2 to ask chicken to perform an additional
> lightweight flow-analysis pass and -lfa2 to link against libfa2.
I consider X-style -foo options to be obsolete, and much prefer the
GNU-style --foo options. I'm always annoyed when I type --foo to
Chicken and it gets mishandled. As a first step to switching, I'd
recommend allowing --foo=bar options everywhere, and eventually
deprecating and removing the -foo options.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
Normally I can handle panic attacks on my own; but panic is, at the moment,
a way of life. --Joseph Zitt