[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:52:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 11:40:56PM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Hello CHICKEN hackers,
> >
> > I finally finished integrating the code from the numbers egg into CHICKEN
> > 5!
> >
>
> Wow, nice work.
Thanks, everyone :)
> Personally I'd be more than happy to take the performance
> hit on this so long as I can rely on fx operations and/or
> (declare fixnum-arithmetic) to recover the original performance.
You can; I didn't change any of those. The "fixnum mode" probably
still works, too (as in "(declare fixnum)"), but I didn't test it.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Peter Bex, 2015/02/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Felix Winkelmann, 2015/02/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Alex Shinn, 2015/02/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2015/02/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Felix Winkelmann, 2015/02/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2015/02/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Peter Bex, 2015/02/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Peter Bex, 2015/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Alex Shinn, 2015/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Felix Winkelmann, 2015/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Peter Bex, 2015/02/15
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] numbers integration, Felix Winkelmann, 2015/02/15