[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-hackers] Bug in numbers egg (perhaps in scrutiny)
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
[Chicken-hackers] Bug in numbers egg (perhaps in scrutiny) |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jan 2015 01:38:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
The following script works correctly in csi, but produces a warning in csc:
(use numbers)
(define (foo x) (odd? x))
The output is as follows:
Warning: in toplevel procedure `foo':
(foo.scm:2) in procedure call to `numbers#odd?', expected 2 arguments, but
was given 1 argument
If you comment out "(use numbers)", there is no warning.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
We do, doodley do, doodley do, doodley do,
What we must, muddily must, muddily must, muddily must;
Muddily do, muddily do, muddily do, muddily do,
Until we bust, bodily bust, bodily bust, bodily bust. --Bokonon
- [Chicken-hackers] Bug in numbers egg (perhaps in scrutiny),
John Cowan <=