Re: [Chicken-hackers] patch: treat #t as alternative to else in cond

[John Cowan]

Peter Bex scripsit:

> > That may happen at some stage, but (equal? (quote foo) 'foo) => #t,
> > so it is not true in the reader (and would be non-conformant if it were).
> 
> I'd argue that's really a bug or an oversight in the spec.

Eh, well, no Scheme I can test does it that way.  Feel free to argue
your case to the R8RS committee.  :-)

-- 
We call nothing profound                        address@hidden
that is not wittily expressed.                  John Cowan
        --Northrop Frye (improved)