Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #989 and hopefully #877 too

[Jörg F. Wittenberger]

Am 06.11.2013 19:35, schrieb "Jörg F. Wittenberger":
> Am 06.11.2013 19:33, schrieb Mario Domenech Goulart:
> > I'd bet it is a consequence of the introduction of `letrec*'.  The
> > behavior of `letrec' has been fixed with the introduction of `letrec*'
> > (see 
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2013-08/msg00017.html).
> > If you use `letrec' in your code, check if it is ok.
>
> I've just been checking for that one.
>
> At least the petrofsky extraction and Kiseljov's keyword syntax macros 
> do not use letrec directly.
>
> I'm afraid it's something within the macro expander itself... which 
> means that it might effect more code than just the one here.

To that end: my code uses this syntax eventually in the context of a 
lambda.  Maybe that's what's effected?