chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #999 by swapping dependency declaratio


From: Mario Domenech Goulart
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #999 by swapping dependency declarations
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:27:15 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)

On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 18:00:34 +0200 Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:

> Here's another stupid bug fixed.  Turns out that the extras unit
> doesn't really use anything from the ports unit, so it's easily fixed.
>
> This *could* break some programs (that were already broken) where extras
> is USEd and procedures from ports are used.  These should be easily
> fixed, and they were already broken in the first place, so I don't
> consider this a real issue (and the reported bug is worse; it's a
> segfault).  For programs which are a module this won't cause issues.
> I've added a note to NEWS so that people will be aware why their
> programs might suddenly be failing.
>
> I expect some fallout in Salmonella, because test scripts occasionally
> forget to import ports (as even happened in chicken core itself, see
> the patch).

Thanks, Peter.  I pushed your patch.

I quickly run salmonella on the top 10 eggs in the reverse dependencies
rank and on a couple of eggs which are heavy on dependencies (chickadee
and awful-sql-de-lite).  Doesn't cause any breakage, as far as I can
tell.  Let's wait for the next full salmonella report (tomorrow) to see
what happens.

Best wishes.
Mario
-- 
http://parenteses.org/mario



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]