Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Adding iset to core and using it for Unicode-capable SRFI-14.

[Felix]

> 
> That's why I asked in advance what people wanted
> (is lib size or runtime memory or speed more important?),
> and since the only response I got was "could you provide
> a patch" I sent what I think is the best option.
> 
> If we want to trim down the size, there's quite a lot that
> can be removed from iset.  Almost all of the bit-vector
> operations can be removed, and because of the odd way
> I defined those I believe that's taking up most of the
> space.

I want lib-size and speed, please. 

I'd also like to point out that I appreciate that you provided a patch
and am very grateful for your support. And that's not meant in any way
ironically. 


cheers,
felix