Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Adding checks to some procedures that accept integers only

[Peter Bex]

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:54:24PM -0500, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> Signed off and pushed.

Thanks!

> C_i_positivep looks right to me (it's used in positive?).  It does the right
> thing when handed positive and negative infinity and also NaN, at least
> according to R7RS.  Unless I misunderstand you.

It looks I was confused again.  I *think* I may have been referring to
C_u_i_evenp and C_u_i_oddp (these still don't check for nan/inf), but
I'm not sure anymore.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth