Re: [Chicken-hackers] pending patches

[Peter Bex]

Here's a couple of links to the archive.

Luckily, nongnu doesn't scrub attachments :)

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:50:56PM +0100, Felix wrote:
> > 
> > - [PATCH] fix special cases for vector/list-ref in scrutinizer when 
> > argument count is wrong
> >    (here there's a reply with a modified patch)
> 
> Hm. Can't find that one.

original mail:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-02/msg00050.html

I replied to that twice, but nongnu has issues displaying the thread
properly. So here's the link of my second reply directly:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-03/msg00018.html

> > - [CR] deprecate "make" syntax in setup-api
> >    (you said you'd send a patch to the list for this one)
> 
> Did so just now.

Thank you.  I'll take a look later unless someone beats me to it.

> > - Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] random returns the same number on x86_64 
> > all the time
> >    (this is a reply to a patch mail which was applied, but the reply
> >     contains another patch)
> 
> I lost track.

All patches were applied except for the final one:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-03/msg00019.html

> > - [PATCH] Raise error on construction of too large vectors/blobs
> >    (this is a long thread with multiple patches)
> 
> I have to review this, since it seems to duplicate ##sys#check-range.

Fair enough.

> > - [PATCH] Bugfix for #791 and unpack flonums correctly for integer?
> 
> Can't remember.

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-03/msg00010.html

> > - [PATCH] Allow assert to accept an arbitrary expression as the message
> 
> Ah, yeah.

This is being discussed currently.

> > - [PATCH] Fix a few more mistakes in types.db
> 
> Can't remember.

I posted that yesterday:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-03/msg00060.html

> What a mess.

I hope this mail helps to untangle it somewhat.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth