Re: [Chicken-hackers] Thrush operator

[Jörg F . Wittenberger]

On Feb 15 2012, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:

> Hi Jörg,
>
> Jörg F. Wittenberger <address@hidden> writes:
> > I rather loved to think instead of "inserting the (*single*)
> > value of the expression into the next expression" of something
> > along the lines of physical wires:
> > connect (pass) all the result(s) of the first expression into the next
> > (which would then need to accept as many values as the stage
> > before returns.
>
> if I understand you correctly, this is exactly what the starred
> versions, `->*' and `->>*', do. Or did I get you wrong?

Not at all!  It's been me, who missed this second form.
It is the form I meant to suggest.