[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATH] Use hash table instead of flat list for lam
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATH] Use hash table instead of flat list for lambda literals |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:14:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:11:05PM -0700, Alan Post wrote:
> I do think that choice is fine, yes. Does the hash table resize
> itself when it gets too many entries in it?
No, unfortunately these hash tables are pretty basic and too low-level
to do such things.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATH] Use hash table instead of flat list for lambda literals, Felix, 2012/02/27