Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] disable warning for let-bound keyword

[Christian Kellermann]

* felix winkelmann <address@hidden> [111130 13:49]:
> From: Christian Kellermann <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] disable warning for let-bound keyword
> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:12:03 +0100
> 
> > * Christian Kellermann <address@hidden> [111130 11:00]:
> >> No crash with this, thanks. There is a similar call in compiler.scm
> >> around line 609, is it safe to call there?  If it is I will push
> >> out the patch with the above change.
> > 
> > I have pushed the corrected patch. If the compiler.scm hunk is an
> > issue we will make another one..
> 
> The compiler has access to srfi-1 (it is loaded in this case).
> But I will change it to use the simpler code as well.

Ah ok, is it due to known arity that (lambda (x) (car x)) is more
efficient than (map car ...) ?

kind regards,

Christian

-- 
Who can (make) the muddy water (clear)? Let it be still, and it will
gradually become clear. Who can secure the condition of rest? Let
movement go on, and the condition of rest will gradually arise.
 -- Lao Tse.