[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2011 03:42:30 -0400 (EDT) |
From: Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:33:45 -0400
> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:31:36 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:43:45 +0100 (CET) Felix <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
>>> Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in
>>> scrutinizer
>>> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:05:43 -0400
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:28:19 +0100 (CET) Felix <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The attached patch cuts off union ("or") types beyond a certain
>>>>> length. This can happen in complex list literals and pattern matching
>>>>> constructs and slows compilation down to a crawl since these types are
>>>>> again and again walked during simplification.
>>>>>
>>>>> This fixes ticket #711.
>>>>
>>>> Does this patch depend on another one? I can't apply it directly on the
>>>> master HEAD.
>>>
>>> Here it is again. Please try this one.
>>
>> Works fine, thanks a lot. I've closed #711.
>
> Forgot to mention that I've also pushed to master.
Thanks, Mario.
cheers,
felix