[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] umask
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] umask |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:55:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
Hi
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:54:43 +0100 Christian Kellermann <address@hidden> wrote:
> * Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden> [101101 18:40]:
>
>> I haven't found anything related to umask(2) in unit posix or in eggs.
>>
>> Do we have something? In case we don't, should it be added to unit
>> posix? Or to an egg?
>
> I haven't found anything either. I am for putting it in the posix
> unit as that's clearly what it is. Also this should map nicely to
> the umask(2) C function. So how about testing the
> http://wiki.call-cc.org/cr-proposal procedure :)
Sure. I can cook a CR, so we can try the process described by
cr-proposal.
Good idea, Christian.
Best wishes.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario