Re: [Chicken-hackers] something equal? to EQUALP

[Peter Bex]

On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:22:07PM +0200, Felix wrote:
> >> Any ideas for a better name? Any considerations that
> >> should be taken into account?
> > 
> > How about "structurally-equal?"  A little long, but very clear.
> > 
> 
> But isn't equal? also structurally-equal? ?
> 
> What about `same?' or `similar?' ?

That's so vague it could mean anything! ;)

How about "inexactly-equal?"

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth