Re: [Chicken-hackers] top level environment hygiene in Chicken source

[Thomas Bushnell BSG]

Not sure whether you intended this as a complete answer or not; at any
rate, from it I cannot determine the answer to most of the questions I
asked...

On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 00:41 -0600, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Thomas Bushnell BSG <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Most of the procedures in library.scm are defined without the protecting
> > let capture; and by contrast, most procedures elsewhere are not.
> 
> Using 'let' disables some optimizations and is in some places
> a holdover from when the compiler was not as good.
> 
> > And eval.scm doesn't even have usual-integrations (or
> > equivalent) declarations!
> 
> usual-integrations is the default.