[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules? |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:09:18 +0200 |
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Alex Shinn<address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Ursetto <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:58 PM, felix winkelmann<address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM, John Cowan<address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>>>> [*] a lame name - any suggestions are welcome
>>>> How about "roaster" (a U.S. term for a large chicken suitable for
>>>> roasting, typically over 2 kg)?
>>> You're not serious...
>>
>> If this were not a professional project, I would suggest "chicken-shit."
>
> Well, if we're not going to limit ourselves to professional
> sounding names my vote goes for big-fat-cock :)
>
This is getting out of hand ...
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, felix winkelmann, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Peter Bex, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Alex Shinn, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, felix winkelmann, 2009/09/02
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/02
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Kon Lovett, 2009/09/01