[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?
From: |
Alex Shinn |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules? |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:46:28 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin) |
Jim Ursetto <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:58 PM, felix winkelmann<address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM, John Cowan<address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>>> [*] a lame name - any suggestions are welcome
>>> How about "roaster" (a U.S. term for a large chicken suitable for
>>> roasting, typically over 2 kg)?
>> You're not serious...
>
> If this were not a professional project, I would suggest "chicken-shit."
Well, if we're not going to limit ourselves to professional
sounding names my vote goes for big-fat-cock :)
--
Alex
- [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, felix winkelmann, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Peter Bex, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Alex Shinn, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, felix winkelmann, 2009/09/02
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/02
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Kon Lovett, 2009/09/01