[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules? |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:52:32 +0200 |
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Alex Shinn<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> What about generalising this to make it easy for other user
> modules?
>
That's a reasonable suggestion. But note that this "chicken-stuff" unit
is a core library, which will be handled specially anyway (the exports
of core libraries aren't prefixed for example, and don't need imports for
module-less code).
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, felix winkelmann, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Peter Bex, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Alex Shinn, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/01
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, felix winkelmann, 2009/09/02
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, John Cowan, 2009/09/02
Re: [Chicken-hackers] too many core modules?, Kon Lovett, 2009/09/01