[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] numerator/denominator
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] numerator/denominator |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:28:36 +0200 |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:41 PM, John Cowan<address@hidden> wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG scripsit:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 01:45 -0700, Elf wrote:
>> > not all flonums are rational. chicken is perfectly compliant with
>> > r5 here: r5 does not require the entire numeric tower.
>>
>> 1) On Chicken Scheme, all flonums *are* rational.
>
> Arguably that's a bug: +inf, -inf, and +nan are not rational numbers,
> and Chicken should not report them as such.
>
Will be fixed in trunk in a few hours.
cheers,
felix
Re: [Chicken-hackers] numerator/denominator, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2009/08/04
Re: [Chicken-hackers] numerator/denominator, felix winkelmann, 2009/08/05