Re: [Chicken-hackers] numerator/denominator

[felix winkelmann]

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Thomas Bushnell BSG<address@hidden> wrote:
> The manual claims that numerator and denominator are not implemented,
> but of course, they are, just in a way that doesn't quite comply with
> R5RS.  (R5RS says that any rational is a valid argument, but Chicken
> only accepts integers.)
>
> Two possible solutions: Change the manual to document reality; implement
> numerator/denominator for flonums.
>

Thanks, I have removed numerator/denumerator from the list.


cheers,
felix