[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Release candidate for 2.6 avai
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Release candidate for 2.6 available |
Date: |
26 Feb 2007 16:03:52 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
On 26 Feb 2007 15:53:25 -0300 Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:29:20 -0800 "Brandon J. Van Every" <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
> > Builds and installs fine under MSVC. Haven't really tested the
> > functionality though. It always pings my lazy-o-meter, the lack of
> > tests. Are there some simple tests we could agree on to validate the
> > build? If someone would cough those up, I could probably be arsed to
> > incorporate them into the CMake build, ala the CTest / Dashboard
> > mechanism.
>
> I think the benchmarks can be used as a basic test suite.
Forgot to mention that maybe salmonella can be used too. It fetches
the eggs from call/cc.org, builds and installs each (in its own test
repository). It takes a long time and the results have to be manually
analyzed, since there are several causes for a build not succeed
(missing libraries, eggs bugs etc.). But if salmonella reports
success for 200+ eggs, there are good changes the compiler is ok (at
least its basics). :-)
Best wishes,
Mario