Re: [Chicken-hackers] CMake 2.4.5 ships

[Brandon J. Van Every]

felix winkelmann wrote:
> On 12/5/06, Brandon J. Van Every <address@hidden> wrote:
> > The difficulties that people had with 2.4.4 are very serious, so the
> > answer is "yes."  Download your new binary and be happy.  Not interested
> > in having 2.4.4 reflect badly on Chicken for unknown reasons.  It's
> > never about "works on my box."
> >
> > I don't plan to chase every latest greatest CMake release, if there is
> > no need.  But in this case, there is clearly a need.  Kitware would
> > probably like CMake 2.4.4 to, ah, disappear.
>
> Ok. I guess I replace the cmake tarballs on the chicken website, then.

Well, it's not such a critical rush that it's gotta be done right this 
second.  On the other hand, making new tarballs is supposed to be really 
easy.  Is "make dist" working ok on Linux nowadays?


Cheers,
Brandon Van Every