[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?
From: |
Martin Spott |
Subject: |
Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:28:49 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.9.2-20070201 ("Dalaruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.25.4-amd64 (x86_64)) |
Hi Petr and others,
"Gotthard,Petr" wrote:
> Do you know if the latest CERTI does compile at Solaris? I've heard that
> there might be some problems, so I'm planning to give it a try. When do
> you plan to release CERTI 3.3.0? Do I have a chance to fix the Solaris
> issues before the version 3.3.0 is out?
I could at least check it, should someone bother working on it. Trying
to compile the latest release (3.2.7) on Solaris10 with Sun Studio 11
ends with the following message - sorry, _very_ long lines:
CC -xO3 -xtarget=ultra2 -xautopar -xprefetch=auto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..
-I../include -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -DHAVE_XML -I/opt/gnu/include
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/sfw/include -g -DRTI_USES_STD_FSTREAM
-DHAVE_POSIX_CLOCK -c LBTS.cc -DPIC -o .libs/LBTS.o
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/Cstd/./algorithm.cc", line 429: Error: Cannot
assign const std::pair<const unsigned long, double> to
std::back_insert_iterator<std::vector<std::pair<unsigned long, double> >>
without "std::back_insert_iterator<std::vector<std::pair<unsigned long, double>
>>::operator=(const std::back_insert_iterator<std::vector<std::pair<unsigned
long, double> >>&)";.
"LBTS.cc", line 97: Where: While instantiating
"std::copy<__rwstd::__rb_tree<unsigned long, std::pair<const unsigned long,
double>, __rwstd::__select1st<std::pair<const unsigned long, double>, unsigned
long>, std::less<unsigned long>, std::allocator<std::pair<const unsigned long,
double>>>::const_iterator,
std::back_insert_iterator<std::vector<std::pair<unsigned long, double>
>>>(__rwstd::__rb_tree<unsigned long, std::pair<const unsigned long, double>,
__rwstd::__select1st<std::pair<const unsigned long, double>, unsigned long>,
std::less<unsigned long>, std::allocator<std::pair<const unsigned long,
double>>>::const_iterator, __rwstd::__rb_tree<unsigned long, std::pair<const
unsigned long, double>, __rwstd::__select1st<std::pair<const unsigned long,
double>, unsigned long>, std::less<unsigned long>,
std::allocator<std::pair<const unsigned long, double>>>::const_iterator,
std::back_insert_iterator<std::vector<std::pair<unsigned long, double> >>)".
"LBTS.cc", line 97: Where: Instantiated from non-template code.
1 Error(s) detected.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Gotthard,Petr, 2008/06/18
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?,
Martin Spott <=
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Eric Noulard, 2008/06/18
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Eric Noulard, 2008/06/18
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Martin Spott, 2008/06/18
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Eric Noulard, 2008/06/18
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Martin Spott, 2008/06/18
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Eric Noulard, 2008/06/18
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Martin Spott, 2008/06/18
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Eric Noulard, 2008/06/18
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Martin Spott, 2008/06/18
- Re: [certi-dev] Does CERTI compile at Solaris?, Eric Noulard, 2008/06/18