[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:20:23 +1300 |
Hi Reuben,
On Jan 21, 2014, at 12:10 PM, Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 20 January 2014 23:07, Gary V. Vaughan <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Thanks for taking a look at this.
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2014, at 4:07 AM, Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> > I've run out of time for [[debugging the alien.default.memrchr crashes on
>> > glib]] for now. However, I have an idea: how about adding asserts to your
>> > Lua memrchr to check for out-of-bound accesses? I can't see anything wrong
>> > with memrchr itself now, so I suspect bad arguments which merely result in
>> > nil results in the Lua version.
>>
>> I've noticed that about half the time, a random one out of the 100+
>> run-lisp-tests.lua checks (`make tests-check-local`) crashes zmacs using my
>> Lua memrchr too. Instrumenting shows that my memrchr returns the location
>> of EOL prior to the one returned by find_substr(). Naïvely changing memrchr
>> to start the search one byte higher in memory breaks everything though, so I
>> need to spend some time understanding the details of find_substr, and either
>> fix that and whatever changes ripple out from there, or make sure memrchr is
>> interface compatible before swapping it out. At least I have a way of
>> pinning it down now... and then I can make the same changes in the
>> alien.default.memrchr wrapper and hope that works too.
>
> When I was translating all this stuff from C to Lua it was almost always an
> off-by-one bug in these cases. It's possible I may have left some in the Zile
> code myself!
I spotted many of those fixes in the gitlog. However, since there is no
0-based indexing anywhere in Lua Zile, I guess these are purely artifacts of
the C->Lua transition, right? And yet there's a ton of +1 and -1 adjustments
scattered around that I don't fully understand yet. Or are Zile buffers
0-based, and have to be adjusted to Lua 1-based indices? If so, then I might
try and go for a clean slate by making everything 1-based, except when
accepting or displaying buffer indices in the zlisp Defuns...
Thoughts?
Cheers,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
- Re: [Bug-zile] OT: gnulib vs libposix [Was Re: Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files], (continued)
- Re: [Bug-zile] OT: gnulib vs libposix [Was Re: Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files], Reuben Thomas, 2014/01/19
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Gary V. Vaughan, 2014/01/19
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Gary V. Vaughan, 2014/01/19
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Reuben Thomas, 2014/01/19
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Gary V. Vaughan, 2014/01/19
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Reuben Thomas, 2014/01/20
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Reuben Thomas, 2014/01/20
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Reuben Thomas, 2014/01/20
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Gary V. Vaughan, 2014/01/20
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Reuben Thomas, 2014/01/20
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Gary V. Vaughan, 2014/01/21
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Reuben Thomas, 2014/01/21
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Reuben Thomas, 2014/01/21
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Reuben Thomas, 2014/01/21
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Gary V. Vaughan, 2014/01/20
- Re: [Bug-zile] Incremental search is dog slow in moderately-sized files, Reuben Thomas, 2014/01/20