Re: [Bug-zile] Branch Synchronisation

[Reuben Thomas]

On 15 August 2011 17:36, Gary V. Vaughan <address@hidden> wrote:
> I've made sure that all of the patches I have applied to Zile
> are now in place on all 3 active branches (master, lua, zi), so
> everything is at least superficially synchronised, with the
> exception of ba8dd42 "make sure we translate curses BACKSPACE to
> Zile \C-h", as it wasn't entirely clear what the best way to
> make the equivalent change in C should be.

Thanks for this.

> I did pull some of Reuben's simplest recent patches from master,
> and port to lua and zi, but the bulk of the work to port the
> deeper changes that have happened in isolation on master over
> the last few months is still undone.

That's entirely understandable! We'll have to see what happens with
that. There are about 70-odd individual commits that matter, and some
of them are quite simple (for example, various individual C functions
that I found ways to simplify). The more complex work is around the
buffer implementation, which we clearly want to port to the Lua
branches eventually, as part of the "right way" to speed up the Lua
implementation.

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org