bug-texinfo
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: c32width gives incorrect return values in C locale


From: Dagobert Michelsen
Subject: Re: c32width gives incorrect return values in C locale
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 13:06:34 +0100

Hi,

> Am 19.11.2023 um 00:55 schrieb Patrice Dumas <pertusus@free.fr>:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 09:10:09PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 09:42:21AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:22:24AM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
>>>>> On 2023-11-13 01:28, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>>>>> According to your mail
>>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libunistring/2023-11/msg00000.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> char32_t is less portable
>>>>> 
>>>>> That should be OK, if Gnulib provides a char32_t substitute that works 
>>>>> well
>>>>> enough. The mail you refer to merely says that literals like U'x' don't
>>>>> work, but this is not a show-stopper for char32_t.
>>>> 
>>>> Indeed, the solaris10 automatic build now compiles ok with char32_t with
>>>> Gnulib uchar after the changes Gavin made.
>>> 
>>> Is this the OpenCSW buildbot?
>> 
>> Yes.
>> 
>>> How are you checking this?
>>> 
>>> Everytime I have checked
>>> 
>>> https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/buildbot/waterfall?tag=texinfo
>>> 
>>> recently, I have a page with a bunch of error messages on it:
>> 
>> At some point it worked again (presumably on the 15 of october), and I
>> could see that tests passed.
> 
> 15 of November, not October...

The builder on Solaris 10 x86 was disconnected and Buildbot apparently also
had a runtime issue. I restarted everything accordingly and the builds
of texinfo should be clean again:
  https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/buildbot/waterfall?category=texinfo


Best regards

  — Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to 
do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]