bug-tar
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-tar] Just updated debian wheezy to wheezy-backports, tar now 1.


From: Gene Heskett
Subject: Re: [Bug-tar] Just updated debian wheezy to wheezy-backports, tar now 1.27-1
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:03:07 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748)

On Wednesday 13 January 2016 17:40:57 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:10:41 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > tar -cpsf indices.tar.${TAPENAME} $INDICE_PATH  2>&1 >>
> > dd.report$TAPENAME tar -cpsf configuration.tar.${TAPENAME} $CONFPATH
> >  2>&1 >> dd.report.$TAPENAME
>
> (For what it's worth, I believe "-p" also has no effect during a
> create operation, though tar doesn't abort with an error for that
> combination.
>
> From
>  
> https://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_section/tar_70.html#IDX52
>1
 
The $64k question, Nathan, which doesn't seem to be defined in that link, 
is "does it record every nuance of a files permissions and attributes 
regardless?"

A backup that does not contain that info, and recovers it and applies 
them on recovery from some version of defaults that tar considers safe, 
isn't much of a backup.  A full, bare metal recovery would, TBT, not be 
worth doing when you would need to track down and restore working 
ownership and perms to thousands of files is not something I would ever 
tolerate.

Thanks Nathan

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]